ArdelioGet early access →
Operational context for coding agents

Your coding agent has never been on call.

It writes code that's correct in isolation and blind to your org. Ardelio gives every agent the context your seniors carry: who owns this, what broke here last time, what it ripples into. Before the diff exists, and again when the PR comes back.

See how it works↓
agent → ardelio · before the difftrust: high · 118ms

"editing refund.ts in checkout-service. anything I should know?"

owner@payments-team, on call Dana until 18:00
broke hereINC-482, refund double-charge, 3 weeks ago
ripples intoemits refund.issued.v2, consumed by ledger-svc, billing-svc
decisionADR-31: refunds must be idempotent, never retry without a key
CODEOWNERSPagerDutyINC-482ADR-31manifest.yaml
$0.14 /call
If it can't ground a claim, it stays quiet. No noise.
Works with the agent you already useCursorClaude CodeCodexCopilotWindsurfvia MCP
Runs in your cloudRead-onlyData never leaves
The tax on every agent PR

Right now, you are the context.

You pre-load.

The AGENTS.md doesn’t update itself. Before each task, you add the owner, the pattern, the thing that broke here before. It drifts the moment you commit it.

You re-prompt.

Tests pass, but the org wouldn’t. It broke a convention no ADR taught it, or a downstream contract it couldn’t see. You knew. So you correct it, and prompt again.

You reconstruct.

The PR lands on code you don’t own. Before you can sign off, you go hunting for the why. Across Confluence, Slack, six months of commits. You rebuild enough context to trust the diff, then approve.

Ardelio carries that, so you don't.

The context that matters isn't in the repo.

Every code-aware tool reads the same thing: the code. The reason a change is risky usually lives somewhere the code can't show you.

What your tools read
  • ·Functions and types
  • ·Imports and dependencies
  • ·Commit and PR history
  • ·Architectural patterns
What Ardelio adds
  • +Who owns this, and who is on call right now
  • +What broke in production here the last time
  • +What this change breaks downstream, across event contracts
  • +The decision that says why it was built this way

Many sources in.
One answer out.

The same context shows up at both moments.

Before the diff, your agent asks. When the PR comes back, the reviewer gets the same grounded answer, or nothing at all.

agent → ardelio.MCPask
{
"question": "constraints for checkout-service/refund.ts?"
}
ardelio.MCP → agent118ms
{
"owner":      "@payments-team · on call Dana",
"last_incident": "INC-482 · refund double-charge · 3w ago",
"blast_radius": [
"emits refund.issued.v2", "ledger-svc", "billing-svc"
],
"decision":   "ADR-31 · refunds must be idempotent",
"trust":      "grounded"
}
Deterministic and auditable. Every answer carries the sources it came from.
aardeliobotrefund.ts L42

This path caused INC-482 (refund double-charge, 3 weeks ago). ADR-31 requires refunds to be idempotent, and this retry has no idempotency key. Confirm with @payments-team.

INC-482ADR-31CODEOWNERSPR #4812
Grounded in your org's history, or it stays quiet. It comments less, so you act on more.

And when the sources don't agree?

That retry cap was written down three times, three ways. Ardelio doesn't average them or pick the safest. When sources genuinely disagree, it asks the team that owns the call, then remembers the answer.

retry cap?
Confluencecap = 5
PR #4812cap = 2
Slackcap = 3
Conflict → asks the team
Ardelio pings @platform-auth: which retry cap is current?
Clarified, then remembered.

It flags conflicts quietly piling up.

Where it shows up.

Before the diff
The agent carries what applies right here: the owner, the idempotency rule, the co-deploy, the incident this path already caused. It opens pull requests your seniors would approve, not ones they have to send back.
When something breaks
The on-call agent already knows what changed, who owns it, what failed here before, and what not to touch. The runbook comes to the responder, not the other way around.
When someone new starts
Their coding agent already has what the team knows. Onboarding shrinks from months to a session, and the reason behind a decision outlives whoever made it.

How.

Ardelio gathers what your team knows from the sources where it actually lives: repositories and pull requests, code review, Slack, runbooks, deploy logs, on-call rotations, and incident timelines. It reconciles them into one continuously-current picture of how your team builds and operates, then serves it to the agent you already use, at write time and again at review time.

Lives in your own cloud. Read-only credentials. Your data never leaves your environment.

CursorClaude CodeCodexGithub CopilotWindsurf

Stop re-explaining your org to your agent.

Runs in your cloudRead-onlyData never leaves